Our 2026 enterprise AI agent adoption survey, conducted in May 2026 with 517 enterprise companies (1,000+ employees), found that 67% now use AI agents in production workflows — up from 23% in our 2025 survey. The agent category has crossed the enterprise adoption chasm.
Key findings
Adoption by use case
The most common enterprise agent use cases in 2026:
- Customer support (54% of respondents): Sierra and similar platforms are the most-deployed agent category in enterprise.
- Sales and marketing (47%): Relevance AI and Lindy lead for sales automation.
- Software development (42%): Cursor and Claude Code are the dominant tools.
- Internal knowledge management (38%): Microsoft Copilot Studio leads, especially in Microsoft 365 shops.
- Operations automation (31%): Mix of platforms, with Lindy and Relevance leading.
- Research and competitive intelligence (24%): Google Mariner and Perplexity Pro are the primary tools.
Adoption by company size
Adoption correlates with company size:
- 1,000-5,000 employees: 58% adoption
- 5,000-25,000 employees: 71% adoption
- 25,000+ employees: 79% adoption
Larger enterprises are more likely to have adopted agents, but the gap is narrowing. Mid-market companies (1,000-5,000 employees) showed the fastest growth in adoption — up from 14% in 2025 to 58% in 2026.
Spending patterns
Among companies using agents in production:
- Average annual spend: $1.2M
- Median annual spend: $340K
- Spend growth year-over-year: 280%
- Budget allocated to agents as % of IT budget: 8% (up from 2% in 2025)
ROI results
Companies using agents in production report strong ROI:
- Average ROI: 3.4x (i.e., $3.40 in value for every $1 spent)
- Median ROI: 2.8x
- % reporting positive ROI: 81%
- % reporting ROI > 5x: 24%
Challenges reported
The most common challenges cited by enterprise adopters:
- Security and compliance concerns (cited by 62%): See our AI Agent Safety Guide for how to address these.
- Integration complexity (54%): Connecting agents to legacy systems is the biggest technical challenge.
- Skill gaps (47%): Finding employees who can effectively deploy and manage agents.
- Cost predictability (41%): Usage-based pricing makes budgeting difficult.
- Quality control (38%): Ensuring agent outputs meet enterprise standards.
Methodology
This survey was conducted in May 2026 with 517 respondents from companies with 1,000+ employees. Respondents were IT decision-makers, operations leaders, and practitioners involved in AI agent deployment. Full methodology is available on request.
Explore more AI agent guides
Browse our complete library of reviews, comparisons, and how-to guides.
Browse all guides